Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5396 14
Original file (NR5396 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY -
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

 

 

pic
Docket No. NR5S396-14
oO 26 Nov 14
‘From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj:
Ref: {a} Title 10 U.S.c. 1552

Enci: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
{2) NPC memo 1160 Ser 813/255 dtd 23 Oct 14
(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1} with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to show the Petitioner reenlisted and is eligible for advancement
under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR)
program.

2. The Board, consisting of ee ey
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on

25 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record, Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,

_Yeguiations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's. allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations

within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office

having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s

application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
Docket No. NR5396-14

RECOMMENDATION :

 

—-— —PhatPetittoners—naval record be-corrected, _where-appropriate;—to
show that:

a. The Petitioner was discharged on 4 January 2014 and
reenlisted, under the provisions of the STAR program, on 5 January
2014. @fhe term is 6 years. The immediate reenlistment contract will _
reflect the following paragraph: “Career designated under MILPERSMAN
1160-100.” Note; Petitioner graduated from school (NEC 1330) on or
about 24 February 2011.

b. This change will entitle the member to a zone “A” SRB with an
award level of 2.0 ($60,000 dollar award ceiling) for the FT/13Xx
rate/NEC.

c. The Petitioner was advanced to Petty Officer Second Class
effective 16 June 2014, vice 28 June 2014.

d. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.

4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and. complete record $f
the Board's proceedings in the above entitled matter.

  

BARBARA A, NAHULAK
Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6{e)} and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Seenekary of the

Navy.

26 Nov 14

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1537 14

    Original file (NR1537 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, 12 effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner reenlisted and eligible for advancement under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5756 14

    Original file (NR5756 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS fU7 5S. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner reenlisted and is eligible for advancement under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. ‘The Board, consisting of Qa reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6866 14

    Original file (NR6866 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    LPrvaned DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BROS BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS f01 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 BIC Docket No. NR6866-14 9 Dec 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC memo 1160 Ser 813/169 dtd 7 Aug 14 (3) Subject’s naval record 1.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1369 14

    Original file (NR1369 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that ‘the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract, and Petitioner eligible for advancement under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr: Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on .18...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3591 14

    Original file (NR3591 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    LSS2 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC memo 1160 Ser 913/163 dtd 31 Jul 14 (3) Subject's naval record le Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner reenlisted and eligible for advancement under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10814-09

    Original file (10814-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    10814-09 23 Dec 09 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: | Ref: (a} Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. = CONCLUSTON Upon review and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08938-09

    Original file (08938-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    8938-03 17 Nov 09 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO . Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr....

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2952 14

    Original file (NR2952 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinaiter yeferred to as Petitioner, Filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner reenlisted and eligible for advancement under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) 2, The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice. CONCLUSION Upon review and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3622 14

    Original file (NR3622 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be correc to show the Petitioner reenlisted and eligible for advancement un the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. 2, The Board, consisting of Mr. Bey, Mr. Genteman, and Ms. Polk, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 October 2014 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07430-06

    Original file (07430-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 December 2006 and, pursuant to its...